Is Azure Analysis Services Enough? When to Use Databricks, Snowflake, Dremio or Synapse — A Guide for Emerging Data Engineers

Introduction

At DataEra, we see many young data engineers struggle with one core dilemma: should the data stack rely solely on Azure Analysis Services (AAS) — or is it wiser to bring in more expansive tools like Databricks, Snowflake, Dremio, or Synapse?

In the early days of BI, a robust semantic model (e.g. in AAS) plus a data warehouse was enough. However, today, with the advent of big data, real-time analytics, machine learning, and multi-cloud demands, the landscape has undergone significant changes. Some tools that were once niche are now mainstream.

Our goal in this post:

• Explain what each of these platforms really brings to the table,

• Demystify when and why you’d pick one over another,

• Ask the right questions, and you should carry forward in your career.

• And help you architect with flexibility, not dogma.

Think of this as your “decision compass” in the first few years of your data journey.

What Is Azure Analysis Services — And Where It Fits

Before comparing, let’s anchor ourselves: What is AAS, and what is its sweet spot?

• Azure Analysis Services is the cloud version (PaaS) of SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS) Tabular.

• It enables the creation of semantic models (tabular models), in-memory caching, DAX calculations, role-based security, and fast OLAP-style queries.

• Because it sits “above” your data warehouse or data lake, it abstracts away complexity for business users and BI tools.

• It works well when your data volume is moderate, most transformation happens upstream, and your main need is fast interactive reporting via Power BI / Excel / dashboards.

But AAS has constraints:

1. Scale & concurrency
   As your data scales to hundreds of millions or more, or many users query simultaneously, performance tuning becomes harder.
   Also, in highly concurrent BI-heavy workloads, some limitations of the underlying MPP system (if backed by SQL DW / Synapse) apply. (According to a Microsoft Answers forum discussion, AAS may avoid some of the queuing constraints in dedicated SQL DW for concurrent users.)

2. Data engineering / complex transformations / big data
   AAS is not a full ETL / data engineering engine. It expects clean, prepared data. For heavy transformations, streaming ingestion, or ML pipelines, you’ll want more.

3. Beyond structured & batch data
   If you have semi-structured data, event streams, or real-time analytics, AAS alone may not be enough.

So: AAS is excellent when your focus is on interactive analytics on structured data, within the Microsoft ecosystem, and your transformations are handled elsewhere. But it’s not “one ring to rule them all.”

Major Players & When to Use Them

The data landscape is broad, and each platform brings something unique to the table. From DataEra’s experience, here’s how to think about the major players—what they offer, and when you might lean on them.

Azure Synapse Analytics
Synapse is Microsoft’s unified analytics service. It combines data warehousing, big data exploration, pipelines, serverless queries, and Spark into one environment. It’s a strong choice when you need an enterprise-grade warehouse with tight Azure integration, and when you want to run analytics across both structured and unstructured data without leaving the ecosystem. But remember: its richness also means complexity. You’ll need to balance cost models (serverless vs. dedicated) and avoid assuming it can replace every specialised tool.

Databricks
Databricks positions itself as a “lakehouse” platform, built on Apache Spark. It’s perfect when your world involves large, fast-growing datasets, real-time ingestion, machine learning, or advanced transformations. The collaborative notebooks and Delta Lake layer make it especially appealing for teams working across engineering, science, and analytics. The flip side? It comes with a learning curve—understanding Spark clusters, tuning, and cost governance are critical to success.

Snowflake
Snowflake has redefined what a cloud-native data warehouse looks like. With its separation of compute and storage, near-infinite scalability, and strong concurrency, it’s become the go-to choice for organisations working across multiple clouds or wanting less operational overhead. Its simplicity and performance are major draws, but for heavy data science, streaming, or advanced ML, you may still need complementary tools alongside it.

Dremio
Dremio is often called a “query acceleration layer” for data lakes. It allows you to run high-performance analytics directly on open formats like Parquet and Iceberg, without creating endless copies of data. This makes it a great option for organisations that want self-service analytics with minimal ETL overhead. The trade-off is that not every complex workload fits, and some tuning is still required to get consistent performance.

Other Emerging Options
Beyond these major players, technologies like Apache Kafka (for streaming) and AI-driven tools like OpenAI are increasingly part of modern stacks. Kafka becomes essential if you’re working with event-driven or real-time pipelines. AI-driven layers, on the other hand, can help unlock generative analytics or agent-driven insights. They don’t replace your warehouse or lakehouse—they complement them.

When to Use What — Thought Experiments for You as a Data Engineer

Let me pose a few realistic scenarios — and questions you should ask yourself:

1. Scenario: You are starting on a new data project

   • You have multiple relational data sources, moderate volume (tens to hundreds of millions of rows), and BI users want fast dashboards.

   • Question: Can I start with AAS + SQL DW / Synapse dedicated pools and delay adoption of heavier tools?

   • Consider: If your transformations are light and you foresee moderate growth, yes, AAS is a reasonable starting point.

2. Scenario: Data volumes are exploding

   • You now ingest semi-structured logs, IoT streams, and your engineers want to run ML models.

   • Question: Should I bring in a lakehouse / big data engine (Databricks) and leave AAS for the semantic layer only?

   • Consider: Yes. Use Databricks (or similar) for transformations, feature engineering, and real-time updates; use AAS (or Power BI semantic) for front-end reporting.

3. Scenario: Cross-cloud / collaboration / multi-tenant

   • Your company works across Azure, AWS, and GCP. Your partners and clients need access to data.

   • Question: Should I choose a portable, managed data warehouse like Snowflake?

   • Consider: Snowflake gives you flexibility to avoid vendor lock-in. Its compute/storage decoupling also helps with concurrency.

4. Scenario: Self-service analytics on raw data lake

   • You want analysts to directly query data in ADLS or S3, without ETL latency.

   • Question: Can Dremio help reduce your ETL burden?

   • Consider: Yes — Dremio helps you build an acceleration/reflection layer so queries become fast without massive replication.

5. Scenario: Real-time insights, streaming use cases

   • You have event-driven data, near-instant analytics needed, alerts, anomaly detection.

   • Question: Where does Kafka / real-time engine / AI close the loop?

   • Consider: Kafka for ingestion, stream processing engines (Spark Structured Streaming, Flink, etc.), then feed results into your analytic warehouse or semantic model. AI/agent layers may sit above.

Guiding Principles (DataEra’s Wisdom)

As you build your career, here are a few principles we at DataEra believe in:

• Composable architecture > Monolith
  Don’t force yourself into one tool that does “everything.” It’s better to pick best-of-breed, but keep them well integrated.

• Start simple, evolve fast
  Use semantic modelling early (AAS / Power BI/cubes) when value comes from insight speed. Shift into advanced tools only as demand grows.

• Always layer abstraction
  Treat your tools (Databricks, Synapse, Snowflake) as plumbing. End users should deal with semantic layers, not internal complexity.

• Optimise cost-performance tradeoffs
  Every new tool adds cost. Monitor usage, pick the correct tiers, and don’t overprovision early.

• Stay curious & revisit architecture
  The data world changes fast. A few years ago, Lakehouse was niche. Today it’s mainstream. Keep asking: “Is this stack still optimal?”

Common Questions You Might Be Asking

• “Can Synapse replace AAS entirely?”
  While Synapse has many analytics and integration features, the semantics + caching + DAX advantages of AAS still give it purpose. Use cases differ.

• “Is Snowflake or Databricks ‘better’?”
  It’s not binary. Snowflake excels at managed SQL-first analytics; Databricks is stronger for engineering, streaming, and ML. Many organisations use both.

• “Will Dremio make my ETL vanish?”
  It can reduce ETL for some use cases, but transformations/cleaning/modelling generally still belong in dedicated engines.

• “As a junior engineer, which should I learn first?”
  Start with AAS/Power BI + SQL / semantic modelling. Then pick a big data or cloud analytics tool (e.g. Databricks) as your second core skill. Understanding multiple gives you versatility.

Conclusion

At DataEra, we believe Azure Analysis Services is a strong starting point, especially in Microsoft-centric environments. But it is rarely enough as demands grow. The question is not "AAS or Databricks / Snowflake / Synapse / Dremio" — it’s "Which combination of tools should I bring in, when, and why?"

For the early years of your career, your focus should be:

1. Master the semantic layer and BI mindset (e.g. AAS, DAX, modelling).

2. Understand a big data/lakehouse tool (e.g. Databricks, Synapse).

3. Learn data warehouse / SQL scaling (e.g. Snowflake, Synapse).

4. Explore query acceleration/data virtualisation (e.g. Dremio).

5. Stay abreast of streaming (Kafka), AI, and real-time platforms.

You’ll soon face architecture decisions: “Do I keep using AAS? Or drop it? Or use it just for front-end?” Use this post as your checklist. Revisit your choices every 6–12 months as data and tech evolve.

Have a question? Contact us for a Free Consultation